Welcome to the Triangle Website, for optimal user experience we recommend that you view our website using Mozilla Firefox: High Performance Super Speed Browser, faster start-up times, rapid graphics rendering and improved page load speed, the latest version of Firefox is full of major performance improvements you’ll notice instantly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Everyone has the right to hold their own opinions and to express them freely without interference.
This includes the right to express your views aloud or through: published articles, books or leaflets, television or radio broadcasting, works of art and communication on the internet
Residents Have Rights
12 July 2011
There are more than 1,100 bat species in the world
David Moores banked £89m
Quick links
ANFIELD RESIDENTS HAVE RIGHTS
TRIANGLE NEWS REPORTS
YOUR NEIGHBOURS WALK ALONE
CRONIN COWELL & SONS - ROUGE SOCIAL LANDBANKING
HIDDEN KILLER
Liverpool City Council "POCKET HOMES"
THE JEDI COUNCIL
Open Educational Resources
|
PART 3
From: THE TRIANGLE Received: 17/10/13 To: MARK KITTS Subject: Re: Your Email 17 October 2013 Dear Mark Thank you for your email, your apology is appreciated and accepted but with all due respect, we feel it is far too late in the day for us to consider it to be anything more than a token gesture. Don't take that the wrong way, we are happy to accept a token gesture as it has made for a refreshing change. We get the feeling that you are attempting to rebuild some burning bridges, if that is indeed the case then we are listening and the ball is in your court. Regarding the long term anti social behaviour instigated by your long term PARTNERS - LFC and Arena/Your Housing Group: we believe that your current and historic working relationship with said PARTNERS could be seen as a conflict of interest which would seriously question and potentially undermine your ability to remain impartial while officially adjudicating the merits of our accusations. We would like to state that we will adhere to and respect your decision to dismiss our claim even though you have not seen the full extent of the evidence. We are assessing our options with a view to either pursuing our claim of long term anti social behaviour via other means or pursuing a corporate negligence claim under environmental and Human Rights law. Mark, we would like you to note that, our motivation stems from the inability of the three elected ward Councillors, Cllr Annie O'Byrne, MP Steve Rotheram, yourself and many others, to tell the truth. We know the truth, but we had to prove it before we were taken seriously and to allow the average person to understand the obvious complexity of the issues that this community has been fighting against since the mid nineties. No one has ever helped the people, it's all LFC, LFC and a bit more LFC - this is our community not LFC's, they just happen to run a moderately successful business in the area, not in the community - the area! They are not Anfield, we the residents are Anfield! The quicker LFC accept that, the better it will be for all concerned. Your email suggested that our previous communication had enlightened us about your active liaisons with your partners and your plans, we had been well aware of your liaisons and your plans years before any of our communication took place. The only new knowledge that we gleaned from our short lived communications is that we should not trust you and you have a phobia of answering perfectly reasonable questions. Your timely apology has afforded you a glimmer of respect and we believe you have taken a positive step in the right direction. Yours Sincerely The Triangle 
From: THE TRIANGLE Received: 24/10/13 To: Justine Jenkins-Burke Subject: Re: Failure of Duty 24 October 2013 Dear Justine Can you explain why your department has failed in it's duty to supply us with the answers to the questions we have asked of you on three previous occasions? We are within our lawful right to ask for information from your department as to how you reached your decision regarding our claims of long term anti-social behaviour. Therefore we must repeat the unanswered questions that we have previously asked of you:
Yours Sincerely The Triangle 
From: THE TRIANGLE Received: 30/10/13 To: M.B. Kenworthy, Assistant City Solicitor Subject: Thank You Dear Mr Kenworthy Thank you for your email, your assurances, your understanding but most of all, for answering our questions. As far as we are concerned, this matter has been resolved, therefore we have no further need for clarification. Yours Sincerely The Triangle 
From: THE TRIANGLE Received: 01/11/13 To: M.B. Kenworthy, Assistant City Solicitor Subject: Crime and Disorder Act 1998 1 November 2013 Dear Mr Kenworthy We are writing to you in an effort to allow us the opportunity to fully comprehend your email of 29/10/2013. Although we do not require further clarification from Justine Jenkins - Burke regarding the questions that she consistently refused to answer, we do have cause to challenge your email. Acting upon your role as Assistant City Solicitor you stated that anti-social behaviour only relates to "individual human beings" as described by the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 more particularly as “any person aged 10 or over”. We would like to respectfully challenge your statement that "any person" exclusively relates to a Human Being, the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 and the Anti-Social Behaviour Act 2003 do not include the word Human Being (see images below). The inclusion of the words "any person" is legally ambiguous and open to legal interpretation. Therefore, we would respectfully suggest that "any person" could well be interpreted as encompassing any legally defined person: Person: In general usage, a human being; by statute however, the term can include businesses, organisations, partnerships, associations, corporations, legal representatives, trustees, trustees in Bankruptcy, or receivers. For purposes of the constitutional guarantees of equal protection of laws and Due Process of Law - A Corporation is a "person" Every "corporate entity" is afforded legal status as a person: Corporate person-hood is the legal concept that a corporation may be recognized as an individual in the eyes of the law. This doctrine forms the basis for legal recognition that corporations, as groups of people, may hold and exercise certain rights under the common law and the UK Constitution. For example, corporations may contract with other parties and sue or be sued in court in the same way as natural persons or unincorporated associations of persons. The doctrine does not hold that corporations are flesh and blood "people" apart from their shareholders, officers, and directors. Yours Sincerely The Triangle |
The Triangle Website "FAIR USE" Declaration
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favour of fair use. The Triangle website and forum may contain copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorised by the copyright owner. In the wider interests of the Anfield community - The Triangle website has made this material available – in an effort to advance the understanding of social and environmental responsibility issues, corporate accountability and human rights. Where possible The Triangle website has endeavoured to acknowledge ownership of such content contained herein.
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favour of fair use. The Triangle website and forum may contain copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorised by the copyright owner. In the wider interests of the Anfield community - The Triangle website has made this material available – in an effort to advance the understanding of social and environmental responsibility issues, corporate accountability and human rights. Where possible The Triangle website has endeavoured to acknowledge ownership of such content contained herein.
It's Time To End The Lies
The Triangle website members volunteer their time and knowledge of key issues to help and support our fellow residents.
Copyright © 2012 The Triangle. All rights reserved. The Triangle website is non-funded and non-profit generating
Copyright © 2012 The Triangle. All rights reserved. The Triangle website is non-funded and non-profit generating