The Triangle - Supporting Local People
  • Home
    • Overview
    • Spinless Turds
    • LFC - Funding CPO>
      • LCC CABINET AGENDA PART 1
    • CABINET MEETING AGENDA>
      • CABINET MEETING - DECISION
    • Community Safety Warning>
      • Asbestos - six fibrous minerals
      • Where is asbestos found?
    • Holy Bats, Batman>
      • Holy Bats
    • Rockfield Project - Disposal of Properties>
      • Rockfield Project - Part 2
      • Rockfield Project - Part 3
      • Rockfield Project - Part 4
      • Rockfield Project - Property Map
    • Steve Rotheram MP - 1>
      • Time to wake up 2
      • Time to wake up 3
      • Time to wake up 4
      • Time to wake up 5
      • Time to wake up 6
      • Rockfield Residents Association Committee
      • Scottie Press
    • 200 Empty Homes 1>
      • 200 Empty Homes 2
      • 200 Empty Homes 3
      • 200 Empty Homes 4
    • HOW DID IT ALL BEGIN?>
      • How Did It All Begin? cont.
    • Anfield Plus 1999>
      • Who is to BLAME for the BLIGHT
      • PARTNERS Announcement 15/10/2012
  • About Us
    • Power to the PEOPLE
    • Take ACTION NOW!
    • Wake up
    • Contact Us
  • The Secret Marks
    • Trojan Homes
    • The Theoretical Anfield Project 2013
    • The Rings of FIRE
    • The Promised Land>
      • Liverpool Confidential
      • Liverpool Confidential - Ransom
    • Artificial Ploy
    • Local Authority Misfeasance?
  • Press Cuttings
    • Triangle News
    • City Council Letters
    • Community Newsletters
    • Gallery>
      • Gallery #2
      • Gallery #3
      • Videos
    • All Mapped Out
  • Speak Out
    • Anti -Social Behaviour>
      • Anti -Social Behaviour - Part 2
      • Anti -Social Behaviour - Part 3
      • What is a Person?
      • What is a Person? Part 2
    • Residents demand to know
    • Residents Views
    • Anfield Property Game>
      • Property Speculators 1
      • Property Speculators 2
    • Show Us The MONEY
    • The Great Anfield Property Game
    • Rockfield Lincoln's Address
    • A Real Reporter
    • Three Stooges
  • Human Rights
    • Human Rights - Part 2
    • Know Your Rights
    • CPO's
    • How to protest within the law
    • Understanding The Freedom of Information Act
  • Housing Deal
    • Regeneration or Degeneration
    • Regeneration Express?
    • Rockfield Refurbishment Options
    • Anfield's Ghost Town
    • FSG decide on new stadium – Report
    • Anfield Stadium Update: July 2011
    • Question 13
    • Unlocking the Potential of Empty Homes
    • The barriers to Liverpool FC
    • Secret Millionaire - Welcome to Anfield
Picture

Welcome to the Triangle Website, for optimal user experience we recommend that you view our website using Mozilla Firefox: High Performance Super Speed Browser, faster start-up times, rapid graphics rendering and improved page load speed, the latest version of Firefox is full of major performance improvements you’ll notice instantly.



Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture


Everyone has the right to hold their own opinions and to express them freely without  interference.
This includes the right to express your views aloud or through:
published articles, books or leaflets, television or radio broadcasting, works of art and communication on the internet


Picture
HOME
ABOUT US
SECRET MARKS
PRESS CUTTINGS
SPEAK OUT
HUMAN RIGHTS
HOUSING DEAL
Picture
Picture
Picture
Residents Have Rights 12 July 2011
Picture
Picture
Picture
There are more than 1,100 bat species in the world
Picture
David Moores banked £89m

Quick links
  1. HOW DID IT ALL BEGIN?
  2. How Did It All Begin? cont.
  3. PARTNERS Announcement 15/10/2012
  4. Rockfield Lincoln's Address
  5. Take ACTION NOW!
  6. Power to the PEOPLE
  7. Local Authority Misfeasance?
  8. Trojan Homes
  9. The Theoretical Anfield Project
  10. Show Us The MONEY
  11. Anfield Plus 1999
  12. The Rings of FIRE
  13. The Promised Land
  14. Passing the buck
  15. Gallery
  16. Gallery #2
  17. Gallery #3
  18. Videos
  19. LFC Housing Deal
  20. FSG decide on new stadium –
  21. Report Residents demand to know
  22. Anfield Stadium Update: July 2011
  23. Question 13
  24. Unlocking the Potential of Empty Homes
  25. The barriers to Liverpool FC
  26. Secret Millionaire - Welcome to Anfield 
  27. A Real Reporter
  28. The Great Anfield Property Game
  29. Regeneration or Degeneration 
  30. Regeneration Express?
  31. Rockfield Refurbishment Options
  32. Who is to BLAME for the BLIGHT
  33. CPO's
  34. How to protest within the law 
  35. Understanding The Freedom of Information Act
  36. Residents Views
  37. Human Rights
  38. Contact Us
Picture
ANFIELD RESIDENTS HAVE RIGHTS
Picture
TRIANGLE NEWS REPORTS
Picture
YOUR NEIGHBOURS WALK ALONE
Picture
CRONIN COWELL & SONS - ROUGE SOCIAL LANDBANKING
Picture
HIDDEN KILLER
Picture
Liverpool City Council "POCKET HOMES"
Picture
THE JEDI COUNCIL
Picture
Open Educational Resources
_We are committed to helping the residents of the Rockfield Triangle and the wider Anfield area by addressing the important issues that have blighted the Anfield community for so long.

Picture
Picture

Get off the grass! Dog-walking & bird-feeding hit lists of UK offenses
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lj-VovhJcPA

Picture
PART 3

Picture
Picture

From: THE TRIANGLE
Received: 17/10/13
To: MARK KITTS
Subject: Re: Your Email


17 October 2013

Dear Mark

Thank you for your email, your apology is appreciated and accepted but with all due respect,  we feel it is far too late in the day for us to consider it to be anything more than a token gesture. Don't take that the wrong way, we are happy to accept a token gesture as it has made for a refreshing change. We get the feeling that you are attempting to rebuild some burning bridges, if that is indeed the case then we are listening and the ball is in your court.

Regarding the long term anti social behaviour instigated by your long term PARTNERS - LFC and Arena/Your Housing Group:  we believe that your current and historic working relationship with said PARTNERS could be seen as a conflict of interest which would seriously question and potentially undermine your ability to remain impartial while officially adjudicating the merits of our accusations. We would like to state that we will adhere to and respect your decision to dismiss our claim even though you have not seen the full extent of the evidence. We are assessing our options with a view to either pursuing our claim of long term anti social behaviour via other means or pursuing a corporate negligence claim under environmental and Human Rights law.

Mark, we would like you to note that, our motivation stems from the inability of the three elected ward Councillors, Cllr Annie O'Byrne, MP Steve Rotheram, yourself and many others, to tell the truth. We know the truth, but we had to prove it before we were taken seriously and to allow the average person to understand the obvious complexity of the issues that this community has been fighting against since the mid nineties. No one has ever helped the people, it's all LFC, LFC and a bit more LFC - this is our community not LFC's, they just happen to run a moderately successful business in the area, not in the community - the area! They are not Anfield, we the residents are Anfield! The quicker LFC accept that, the better it will be for all concerned. 

Your email suggested that our previous communication had enlightened us about your active liaisons with your partners and your plans, we had been well aware of your liaisons and your plans years before any of our communication took place. The only new knowledge that we gleaned from our short lived communications is that we should not trust you and you have a phobia of answering perfectly reasonable questions. Your timely apology has afforded you a glimmer of respect and we believe you have taken a positive step in the right direction.

Yours Sincerely
The Triangle


Picture

From: THE TRIANGLE
Received: 24/10/13
To:
Justine Jenkins-Burke Subject:
Re: Failure of Duty

24 October 2013


Dear Justine

Can you explain why your department has failed in it's duty to supply us with the answers to the questions we have asked of you on three previous occasions? We are within our lawful right to ask for information from your department as to how you reached your decision regarding our claims of long term anti-social behaviour. Therefore we must repeat the unanswered questions that we have previously asked of you:
  1. Can you elaborate upon your reasoning about "not falling within a remit"? 
  2. Can we obtain a copy of the legislation or guidelines that you used to lawfully formulate your decision?
  3. Are LFC and Your Housing Group lawfully afforded anti - social immunity?
  4. Can expand upon the context of the enquirers you made with internal colleagues of Liverpool City Council?
  5. What influence, if any, did their input have upon your decision? 
  6. What department of Liverpool City Council have you forwarded our concerns to?
  7. How can your department make a decision without viewing the full extent of our comprehensive evidence?
Justine, we would appreciate an explanation of how you reached your decision as we are completely in the dark, we look forward to receiving a timely response to the seven questions we have asked of you. 

Yours Sincerely
The Triangle

Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture

From: THE TRIANGLE
Received: 30/10/13 
To: M.B. Kenworthy, Assistant City Solicitor 
Subject: Thank You


Dear Mr Kenworthy

Thank you for your email, your assurances, your understanding but most of all, for answering our questions. As far as we are concerned, this matter has been resolved, therefore we have no further need for clarification.

Yours Sincerely
The Triangle

Picture

From: THE TRIANGLE
Received: 01/11/13 
To: M.B. Kenworthy, Assistant City Solicitor 
Subject:
Crime and Disorder Act 1998

1 November 2013


Dear Mr Kenworthy


We are writing to you in an effort to allow us the opportunity to fully comprehend your email of 29/10/2013. Although we do not require further clarification from Justine Jenkins - Burke regarding the questions that she consistently refused to answer, we do have cause to challenge your email.

Acting upon your role as Assistant City Solicitor you stated that anti-social behaviour  only relates to "individual human beings" as described by the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 more particularly as “any person aged 10 or over”.

We would like to respectfully challenge your statement that "any person" exclusively relates to a Human Being, the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 and the
Anti-Social Behaviour Act 2003 do not include the word Human Being (see images below). The inclusion of the words  "any person" is legally ambiguous and open to legal interpretation. Therefore, we would respectfully suggest that "any person" could well be interpreted as encompassing any legally defined person: 

Person: In general usage, a human being; by statute however, the term can include businesses, organisations, partnerships, associations, corporations, legal representatives, trustees, trustees in Bankruptcy, or receivers.

For purposes of the constitutional guarantees of equal protection of laws and Due Process of Law -
A Corporation is a "person" Every "corporate entity" is afforded legal status as a person:

Corporate person-hood is the legal concept that a corporation may be recognized as an individual in the eyes of the law. This doctrine forms the basis for legal recognition that corporations, as groups of people, may hold and exercise certain rights under the common law and the UK Constitution. For example, corporations may contract with other parties and sue or be sued in court in the same way as natural persons or unincorporated associations of persons.
The doctrine does not hold that corporations are flesh and blood "people" apart from their shareholders, officers, and directors.


Yours Sincerely
The Triangle

Picture
Crime and Disorder Act 1998
Picture
Picture
Anti-Social Behaviour Act 2003
Picture
Picture
< Previous
Speak Out - Home
What is a Person? >
Picture
HOME
ABOUT US
SECRET MARKS
PRESS
SPEAK OUT
HUMAN RIGHTS
HOUSING DEAL
The Triangle Website "FAIR USE" Declaration
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favour of fair use. 
The Triangle website and forum may contain copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorised by the copyright owner. In the wider interests of the Anfield community - The Triangle website has made this material available  – in an effort to advance the understanding of social and environmental responsibility issues, corporate accountability and human rights. Where possible The Triangle website has endeavoured to acknowledge ownership of such content contained herein. 



It's Time To End The Lies

__The Triangle website members volunteer their time and knowledge of key issues  to help and support our fellow residents.
Copyright © 2012 The Triangle. All rights reserved. The Triangle website is non-funded and non-profit generating 
Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.
!-- Kontera ContentLink(TM);-->